Continuation from Research 5: 1. Identify the article (one more time) that you are examining fro Research 5: author, title, publication source, pages. 2. Analysis–you have already started this from Research 5 — read and analyze that article (not just the abstract): A. Briefly summarize your presentation from Research 5 B.The author’s argument, resolution, or thesis (250 words): Explain the author’s argument, analysis, and the conclusion or resolution reached. For example, the author might offer an argument, a critique, a new approach (a)Argument: the author(s) may be offering an argument such that they may even say ‘we shall argue that…’. Look for stated assumptions, either as identified premises, or necessary principles that underlie the position. (b)Interpretations are also arguments (esepcially if they are eing offered as a new rake on something: basic concepts, definitions, standing theories may be controversial and in need of interpretation or re-interpretation. A philosophical treatment may offer a new interpretation or it may critically examine an already given interpretation. The author(s) might even say ‘we think a new way of defining xyz is needed…etc.). This can also be construed as the opening of an argument. It has parts that fit together a certain way. (c)Prescription: the author(s) may argue for, lay out a proposal for, a new concept—or again, a criticism of a given prescription (perhaps a standard one in the field. It might also have an argument structure, a rationale for why this or that should be so. 3. Your Assessment. 250 words: What makes this article a philosophical article in general and also for the area in the philosophy of X? Three specific questions here. a. What significance does it have for the ‘X’ area in the philosophy of X? b. How does a specialized inquiry/argument of this sort reveal the nature of philosophy? c. In what ways is philosophy of this sort (done by the author of the article) different from the ‘popular’ notion of philosophy as being a personal belief system? Running head: RESEARCH 5 1 Research 5 Student’s Name Institution Affiliation Date RESEARCH 5 2 Identify the article that you have chosen to examine further: Conceptual art and the Acquaintance principle by Louise Hanson. Published by Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, pages 247-258. 2. Read and analyze that article (not just the abstract). The acquaintance principle has attracted broad debate in philosophical aesthetics, with recent development popularizing the claim that some inputs of conceptual art are counterexamples to it (Hanson, 2015). Hanson admits that the claim is correct but needs more examination. Identify the principal stages of the author’s presentation. There are likely to be two major phases in the article that will need examination and explanation: The author’s presentation is characterized by two significant presentations, including attention to and defense to two assumptions that the claim is based on. The first assumption Hanson identifies in his article is the aesthetic versus artistic, while the second is the ontology of conceptual art (Hanson, 2015). The author notes that the acquaintance principle is a concept about aesthetic versus artistic judgment. According to the author, it is possible to think that conceptual art cannot challenge the AP in the right way because the interest in conceptual art is not aesthetic. Hanson argues that the judgment that conceptual art cannot challenge the AP is not aesthetic judgment. Any defender of the identified argument can use two avenues, including creating a case for assuming that the arguments are conceptual arts. The other avenue is that the judgment can be created on a description basis. Hanson notes the assumption objection that the rejection of the work results in providing the argument with more security than it was. The issue that the work is equal to the idea view posed was that it would imply that conceptual artworks RESEARCH 5 3 are that a description can be a means of acquiring an alternative to acquaintances. According to the author, one can resist the temptation to accept the face-value claim based on good reasons. Hanson argues that using the ontology of conceptual art assumption can form judgments concerning artistic value and characteristics of conceptual art based on a description. It implies that it is acceptable that AP cancel judgment of conceptual. However, the restriction only follows from the acquaintance principle only when the description does not allow one to be acquainted with an assignment (Hanson, 2015). A description that does not subject one to a direct acquaintance with work, then the findings that one can create a legitimately create artistic judgments does not cause a problem for acquaintance principle. Hanson notes the assumption objection that argues that description can result in acquaintances by trying to prove that the argument from conceptual art is dedicated to a construal acquaintance. In his opinion, lowering the bar was not necessary since maintaining that looking alone can result in acquaintance was not relevant. RESEARCH 5 4 References LOUISE HANSON. (2015). Conceptual Art and the Acquaintance Principle. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 73(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12181 Purchase answer to see full attachment Tags: Louise Hanson works of conceptual art artistic assumptions aesthetic judgment bar lowering objection User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following our company’shonor code & terms of service.