Presentation will be assessed on the extent and quality to which it meets each
of the following criteria.
1. A description and discussion of the operation of the operation of diverse and complex
government and non-government project contractual arrangements relevant to a range of
managed services, ICT, and build agreements? (20%)
2. An explanation of common arguments using logic, persuasion and influence factors as
commonly applied to conflicting and/or competing stakeholder agendas? (20%)
3. Critical analysis of methods of project negotiation, conflict management, and stakeholder
engagement across projects consisting of differing technology standards and asset lifecycles?
(20%)
4. Appropriate and well structured, concise and clear expression of project management
arguments in response to the assessment task? (5%)
5. A clear flow of thought throughout the presentation with a clear purpose described in the
introduction and a comprehensive conclusion? (5%)
6. A critical review and integration of relevant academic and professional literature (cited at least
twenty (20) times)? (10%)
7. Clarity of expression, grammar and spelling? (5%)
Harvard Referencing Guide? (5%)
9. Appropriate presentation format and presented within slide and note/script limit: 10 to 20 slides
& notes/script? (10%)