CEFS 510
Counseling Project: Conceptualization and Treatment Plan Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Abstract
10 points
An abstract is included that provides a thorough but brief overview of the paper summarizing the main ideas and conclusions in 150-250 words.
8 to 9 points
An abstract is included that mostly provides a brief overview of the paper summarizing some of the main ideas and conclusions in 150-250 words.
1 to 7 points
An abstract is included but missing information and is less than 150 words.
0 points
Not present
Understanding of Theory
16 to 17 points
Solid synopsis of theory is including origination, beliefs about human nature, counseling process, research, compatibility with diverse cultures, and crisis.
13 to 15 points
Proficient synopsis of theory is including origination, beliefs about human nature, counseling process, research, compatibility with diverse cultures, and crisis.
1 to 12 points
Minimal synopsis of theory is including origination, beliefs about human nature, counseling process, research, compatibility with diverse cultures, and crisis.
0 points
Not present
Christian Worldview Compatibility
14 to 15 points
3 compatibilities and 3 incompatibilities with a Christian worldview are addressed.
11 to 13 points
2 compatibilities and 2 incompatibilities with a Christian worldview are addressed. Or 3 of each are listed, but not thoroughly addressed.
1 to 10 points
1 compatibility and 1 incompatibility with a Christian worldview are addressed. Or 2 of each are listed, but not thoroughly addressed.
0 points
Not present
Case Conceptualization
15 to 16 points
Meets expectations at developing a case conceptualization that demonstrates the capacity to formulate a clear understanding of the clients problem integrating biopsychosocialspiritual information from a theoretical perspective.
12 to 14 points
Emerging ability at developing a case conceptualization that demonstrates the capacity to formulate a clear understanding of the clients problem integrating biopsychosocialspiritual information from a theoretical perspective.
1 to 11 points
Insufficient at developing a case conceptualization that demonstrates the capacity to formulate a clear understanding of the clients problem integrating biopsychosocialspiritual information from a theoretical perspective.
0 points
Not present
Theoretical Interventions
16 to 17 points
Meets expectations at selecting 3 theoretical interventions that address the clients presenting issues and take into account client characteristics. Each intervention was adequately defined and application of the intervention was described. One example for each intervention was provided.
13 to 15 points
Emerging ability at selecting 3 theoretical interventions that address the clients presenting issues and take into account client characteristics. Interventions were minimally defined and application of the intervention was minimally described. One example for each intervention was provided.
1 to 12 points
Insufficient at selecting interventions that address the clients presenting issues and take into account client characteristics. Description and application of invention were not sufficient. Examples were partially or not provided.
0 points
Not present
Spiritual Application
14 to 16 points
Meets expectations demonstrating spiritual application.
11 to 13 points
Emerging ability demonstrating spiritual application.
1 to 10 points
Insufficient information or spiritual application.
0 points
Not present
Prognosis/Outcome
14 to 16 points
The expected outcome of using this therapy with the client is thoroughly addressed. The challenging aspects of using this treatment are thoroughly addressed. Referral recommendations are provided.
11 to 13 points
The expected outcome of using this therapy with the client is proficiently addressed. The challenging aspects of using this treatment are proficiently addressed.
1 to 10 points
The expected outcome of using this therapy with the client is minimally addressed. The challenging aspects of using this treatment are minimally addressed.
0 points
Not present
Theoretical Orientation
14 to 16 points
Meets expectations about comparing and contrasting this theory with the students own beliefs and values about counseling.
11 to 13 points
Emerging ability to compare and contrast this theory with the students own beliefs and values about counseling.
1 to 10 points
Insufficient information comparing and contrasting this theory with the students own beliefs and values about counseling.
0 points
Not present
Structure
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Grammar and Spelling, Writing APA
43 to 47 points
The paper is organized in proper APA format. At least 6 academic sources are utilized. The paper is 6-10 pages of content in length, not including title page, abstract, or reference page(s). Spelling and grammar are correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Proper grammar and punctuation are used throughout the paper. Original thought is demonstrated by effectively paraphrasing cited information into own words. In-text citations are appropriately used where applicable. Current APA format is followed.
39 to 42 points
Current APA format is mostly followed. Only 4-5 academic sources are utilized. The content of the paper is 4-5 pages in length. Spelling and grammar are mostly correct. Sentences are mostly complete, clear, and concise. Proper grammar and punctuation are mostly used throughout the paper. Original thought is proficiently demonstrated cited information into own words. Where applicable, references are cited with some APA formatting.
1 to 38 points
Current APA format is not consistently followed. Less than 4 academic sources are utilized. The paper contains less than 4 pages of content.). Spelling and grammar are incorrect. Sentences are not complete, clear, and concise. Proper grammar and/or punctuation not used throughout the paper. Original thought is minimally demonstrated. Where applicable, references are minimally or not cited in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page 1 of 2
Recent Comments