Tutor, going off of what you have already started. What needs to be completed is the Speech 3 Outline Guide. Persuasive Speech Outlines Speech_3-_Persuasive_1_Speech_Outlines_Guide.doc for a policy claim Purpose: To prepare you to give your third speech and to help you understand the unique qualities of a persuasive speech. Instructions: Review the instructions for Speech Assignment 3 below. Compose both a working outline and a speaking outline for your speech. Use the appropriate outline formats for both. You may use any organizational pattern appropriate to your argument, except the motivated-sequence. Speech Research Form Use this form to begin your preliminary research into the topic of your speech. You need to collect information from at least five different database collections using the Park Online Library Databases (http://www.park.edu/library/database.aspx). In addition, you need at least three different types of supporting materials as identified in Chapter 8 of the textbook: brief examples, extended examples, dictionary definition, expert definition, etymological definition, functional definition, expert testimony, lay testimony, statistics, narratives, literal analogies, or figurative analogies. The information you collect must: ? be relevant to your topic; ? be specific (only something you would quote, paraphrase, or summarize in your speech, not an entire article, for example); ? Be purposeful as a specific type of supporting material. SPEECH TOPIC: Should the death penalty be abolished? Source 1: Ebsco Article title: Should the death penalty be abolished? Arguments for and against the centuries-old punishment Author: Gavrilš, Adina Nicoleta Name of periodical: Journal for Communication & Culture Volume: 1 Pages: 82-98 Date: Dec 2011 Database used: Ebsco Date information retrieved: June 2021 Type of supporting material: Information obtained: several countries still do capital punishment, and most of the cases that have the death penalty are always unfair trials for crimes that cannot harm anybody, such as economic, sexually related that relates consenting adults to blasphemy and drugs offenses. Some states argue that they use the punishment in alignment with the conditions and international human rights law. The article discusses that there are no limits on death sentences, whether legal, religious, or economic; the punishment is a hurryingly wicked act. The report also addresses several arguments that concur with capital punishment and see if they present a sound analysis. Source 2: Gale Virtual Reference Library Article title: Denialism and the death penalty Author: Jenny-Brooke Condon Name of periodical: Washington University Law Review Volume: 97 Pages: Date: June 2020 Database used: Gale Academic OneFile Date information retrieved: June 2021 Type of supporting material: other articles, news reports, and book sources Information obtained: the death penalty has been an unfair and ineffective practice, and those features will cause it to end one day. Capital punishment may be constitutional, but many states have begun to use it unfairly, which poses many questions about whether it should be a part of mandatory punishment for severe crimes or not. Denialism allows the Judge to use the death penalty on factual narrative and evidence concerning the penalty and use the execution methods that hide the pain associated with state killing. The execution methods also tend to assume the race of death penalty charge. The article uses the concept of denialism to show and justify whether the judges can use the idea of the death penalty appropriately rather than using it unfairly. The arguments presented by the article indicate that until the concept of denialism is understood, the concept of judicial abolition of the death penalty cannot be ripe and occur. The author identifies the possible entry points for exposing and defeating denialism on the 8th amendment law. The US exceptional retention of death sentence is not based on the ignorance of problems associated with capital punishment but the choices that assume the issues, especially when there is overwhelming evidence. Source 3: Newspaper database Article title: Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished? Author: Nicole Daniels Name of periodical: The New York Times Volume: Pages: Date: January 2021 Database used: Newspaper database Date information retrieved: June 2021 Type of supporting material: other articles through hyperlinks. Information obtained: the article’s arguments are based on the fact that since the other half of 2020, the US government has killed 13 prisoners through capital punishment. Approximately 22 states have abolished the sentence because of the moral issues it presents. Is it legal, however, at the federal level for the death penalty to be done? The article questions whether the US government should still be allowed to conduct death sentences on wrongdoers or whether it must be abolished. As the Supreme Court organized the last execution during Trump’s era, Stephen G. Breyer argued that the justification for the punishment did not entirely answer the inmate’s concerns about the legal implication of the matter. The newspaper reports that Justice Breyer commented that the sentence goes against the 8th amendment of the constitution, presenting a cruel way to punish wrongdoers. The Judge also argued that apart from the constitutional issues the punishment associates, it also goes against the United States policies, morals, and religious grounds. The punishment only allows for severe crimes such as murder. The Judge argued against the sentence because most death sentence cases were based on minor offenses such as theft and sexual abomination. Source 4: Any specialized database Article title: The death penalty and the right to life Author: Mr. Justice Bernard McCloskey Name of periodical: Commonwealth Law Bulletin Volume: 38 Pages: 485-508 Date: September 2012 Database used: Z- library Date information retrieved: June 2021 Type of supporting material: historical reflections, the constitution, Judge’s opinion, articles. Information obtained (copy and paste): the article presents an argument whether the death sentence still follows the constitutional human right to life and whether it denies the prisoners their freedom from cruel and unusual punishment, which the penalty entirely denies. There have been several issues presented about the subject, each being like a mirror from which they all have distinct differences. The only killing that can be justified is killing for self-defense or killing to defend another person in danger. Therefore, the death penalty goes against both constitutional and human rights and freedom. Death is also allowed in other cases, such as whether the medical practitioner will decide to kill a fetus to save the mother’s life. Therefore, the law supports killing only when necessary; in this case, when another person’s life depends on the death of one. Back to the death penalty, the punishment was previously set for more severe crimes. Still, recently, the issue has become controversial because the sentence is currently being used for unfair judgment of some minor offenses. From the justification and rationale of the article, we see many people say that everybody has a right to life and everybody deserves free and equal dignity and freedom, and the law must protect that. Source 5: Any other database Article title: From Measuring Support for the Death Penalty to Justifying Its Retention: Japanese Public Opinion Surveys on Crime and Punishment, 1956– 2014 Author: Mai Sato Name of periodical: Crime and Justice in Contemporary Japan Volume: Pages: 237-252 Date: December 2017 Database used: Google Scholar Date information retrieved: June 2021 Type of supporting material: 23 sources from Google Scholar Information obtained (copy and paste): the death penalty issue has been controversial in Japan for a long time, arguing whether it aligns with civil and political rights. However, the Japanese government has been somehow reluctant to abolish the punishment according to the public viewpoints. The article presents a study that shows how the intensity of the topic has changed, and the argument supports the government’s point of view, indicating that the decision for this subject is not as fast as it may look because the public opinion is neither clear nor consistent. This is because most of the time, when the government wants public opinion concerning abolishing the punishment, most people fully support the idea. The article also argues that if the public wanted the government to abolish the penalty, they would be ready many years ago, since the 20th century. Speech #3: Persuasive 1 Speech Outlines Guide Complete this form. Copy the entire contents of the form. Paste it into a new document. Save the new document as “lastnameHW5.” Upload it to the Week 5 Homework Dropbox. Name: WORKING OUTLINE Complete this outline using complete sentences. Topic: Specific purpose statement: To persuade my audience … Thesis statement (central idea): Organizational pattern (can NOT be Motivated Sequence): Introduction 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Attention-getter: Central idea: Audience relevance: Credibility statement: Preview statement: Transition statement: Body Using the format below, include main points and subpoints as appropriate. I. Main point: A. Subpoint 1. Sub-subpoint a. Sub-sub-subpoint b. Sub-sub-subpoint 2. Sub-subpoint B. Subpoint C. Subpoint Transition statement: II. Main point: A. Subpoint B. Subpoint Transition statement: III. Main point: A. Subpoint B. Subpoint Transition statement: Conclusion 1. Restate the main points: 2. Restate the central idea: 3. Clincher: Bibliography This speech requires you to have at least five sources. SPEAKING OUTLINE Complete this outline using only key words and phrases, plus quotations, statistics, and source information. Transfer this outline to note cards for use when delivering your speech. Insert delivery cues where appropriate. Introduction 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Attention-getter: Audience relevance: Central idea: Credibility statement: Preview statement: Transition statement: Insert delivery cues where appropriate. Body I. Main point: A. Subpoint 1. Sub-subpoint a. Sub-sub-subpoint b. Sub-sub-subpoint B. Subpoint C. Subpoint Transition statement: II. Main point: A. Subpoint B. Subpoint Transition statement: III. Main point: A. Subpoint B. Subpoint Transition statement: Insert delivery cues where appropriate. Conclusion 1. Restate the main points: 2. Restate the central idea: 3. Clincher: Purchase answer to see full attachment Tags: Persuasive Speech communication skills working outline speech analysis organizational pattern User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool’s honor code & terms of service.