For this assignment, you will identify, explain, and provide examples of the four types of listening styles discussed in the textbook. Tip: I uploaded the book pages let me know if you can open them  Objectives: Define the four styles of listening and explain how each may be used effectively. Instructions: Review the four types of listening styles in the textbook and in the learning activities assigned for this module. Reflect on your own listening style/styles. What has worked well and what could be improved upon? Describe a time when your listening style proved effective, or ineffective. Write a three to five page descriptive essay that defines each of the listening styles and addresses the questions above.  Writing Assignments Rubric (1) Writing Assignments Rubric (1) Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Ideas This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Development Ratings Pts 10 pts Ideas are clear, insightful, thoughtprovoking, and focused so that they consistently support the topic, thesis and audience for the paper. 8.5 pts Ideas are clear and focused to support the topic and a clearlystated central idea, but are not consistently insightful or thoughtprovoking. 7 pts Ideas are clear but conventional or general, and support the topic, thesis, and audience for the paper. 5 pts Ideas are unclear or clichéd and demonstrate a lack of focus in support of the topic or a central idea, which may be vague or missing. 10 pts Development is fresh, with abundant details and examples that arouse audience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific and insightful evidence in support of sound logic. 8.5 pts Development is adequate, but may lack depth, with details and examples that arouse audience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific evidence in support of sound logic. 7 pts Development is sufficient but general, providing adequate but perhaps not interesting details, examples, and evidence that include no logical fallacies or unsupported claims. 5 pts Development is insufficient, providing scarce or inappropriate details, evidence, and examples that may include logical fallacies or unsupported claims. 10 pts 10 pts Writing Assignments Rubric (1) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization 10 pts Organization is coherent, unified and effective in support of the paper’s purpose/ plan and consistently demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs. 8.5 pts Organization is coherent, unified and effective in support of the paper’s purpose/ plan and usually demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs 7 pts Organization is coherent and unified overall in support of the essay’s purpose/ plan, but is ineffective at times and may demonstrate abrupt or weak transitions between ideas or paragraphs. 5 pts Organization is confused and fragmented in support of the essay’s purpose/ plan and demonstrates a lack of structure or coherence that negatively affects readability. 7 pts Style is readable, but unremarkable in tone, sometimes including a lack of sentence variety effective word choice, or some distracting, but not serious, errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Readable but inconsistent style) 5 pts Style is incoherent or inappropriate in tone, including a lack of sentence variety, ineffective or inappropriate word choice, and serious errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Ineffective style) 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle & Mechanics 10 pts Readable and rhetorically effective in tone, incorporating varied sentence structure, precise word choice and correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Mastery of style) 8.5 pts Style is readable and rhetorically effective in tone, incorporating varied sentence structure, effective word choice, and correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Effective style) 10 pts Writing Assignments Rubric (1) Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat Total Points: 50 Ratings 10 pts Format is correct, meets all assignment directions, and works expertly to support the essay’s purpose/plan. 8.5 pts Format is correct, meets all assignment directions, and works generally to support the essay’s purpose/plan. 7 pts Format is mostly correct, meets critical aspects of assignment directions, and works mostly to support the essay’s purpose/ plan. Pts 5 pts Format is faulty, does not meet sufficient aspects of the assignment direction, and does not support the essay’s purpose/ plan. 10 pts 1. Part 1, Ch 3- Listening in Human Communication 2. DeVito, J. A. (2020). Essentials of Human Communication (10th ed.). Pearson. 3. This is the book my professor offers us; I sent you these links to pages of this chapter let me know if you can open it. https://online.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9780134877303/epubcfi/6/52[%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3DP7001 01545400000000000000000082A]!/4 https://online.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9780134877303/epubcfi/6/54[%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3DP7001 015454000000000000000000857]!/4 https://online.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9780134877303/epubcfi/6/56[%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3DP7001 015454000000000000000000975]!/4 https://online.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9780134877303/epubcfi/6/58[%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3DP7001 0154540000000000000000009CF]!/4 https://online.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9780134877303/epubcfi/6/60[%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3DP7001 015454000000000000000000B20]!/4 Purchase answer to see full attachment Explanation & Answer: 3 pages Tags: Advanced listening skills effective listeners Empathic listening Polite listening Active listening User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following our company’shonor code & terms of service.