HU240 Herzing Unit 4 Most Influential Books Assessment Report
Question Description
Unit 4 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Books
Submit Assignment
Due Sunday by 10:59pm
Points 85
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Instructions
Contrast: Books
Evaluation Title: Compare and Contrast Books
Look up all of the books from the list below and write a 2 sentence description about each one.
Why do you think each book has been important throughout history?
The Meaning of Relativity by by Albert Einstein
On the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin
Geographia by Ptolemy
Silent Spring by Rachel Carson
The Complete Works of William Shakespeare By William Shakespeare
The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer
Uncle Tom’s Cabin by Harriett Beecher Stowe
1984 by George Orwell
The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank
Critique of Pure Reason by Immanuel Kant
Native Son by Richard Wright
The Jungle by Upton Sinclair
Tibetan Book of the Dead
The Bible
The Qur’an
The Torah
Remember to add your Reference in APA format.
Estimated time to complete: 3 hours
Rubric
HU240 Unit 4 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Books
HU240 Unit 4 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Books
Criteria Ratings
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
27.0 pts
Level 5
Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.
24.0 pts
Level 4
Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.
22.0 pts
Level 3
Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.
19.0 pts
Level 2
Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.
16.0 pts
Level 1
Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
27.0 pts
Level 5
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
24.0 pts
Level 4
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
22.0 pts
Level 3
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
19.0 pts
Level 2
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
16.0 pts
Level 1
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology
15.0 pts
Level 5
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.
14.0 pts
Level 4
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.
12.0 pts
Level 3
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.
11.0 pts
Level 2
Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.
9.0 pts
Level 1
Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10.0 pts
Level 5
The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
6.0 pts
Level 4
The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.
4.0 pts
Level 3
The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication
2.0 pts
Level 2
The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
1.0 pts
Level 1
The assignment exhibits l