Details:Complete the peer evaluation form. In considering what score to award each member, reflect upon communication styles, conflict-management style, decision-making ability, leadership role, as well as the quality of work and effort exerted into making the project successful.MGT 605PEER EVALUATION Complete this peer evaluation for each
member of your team, including yourself. The average score from these
evaluations will be your grade for the assignment. Rate each team member on a scale of 1 to 100
with 100 being highest. Use the rubric on the second page to determine the
score for each team member. Include comments explaining why you gave your
teammate this score. Your peer evaluations will be kept strictly
confidential. Your grade for the evaluation will be posted in the Grade book
as an assignment, but individual ratings will not be shared.

Group member: List names

Rating: 1 – 100

Comments: Must be completed for each
team member

1. Your
name

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

CATEGORY

100-93 pts (A) Excellent

92-83 pts (B) Good

82-73 pts (C) Improving

72-0 pts (D) Needs
Improvement

Contributions

Routinely provides useful
ideas when participating in the group discussion. Contributes a lot of
effort.

Usually provides useful
ideas when participating in the group discussion. A good group member who
tries hard.

Sometimes provides useful
ideas when participating in the group discussion. A satisfactory group member
who does what is required.

Rarely provides useful ideas
when participating in the group discussion. May refuse to participate.

Quality of Work

No
correction or revision necessary, work is complete and of high quality.

Revisions
and corrections may not be necessary and work is adequate for what is needed.

Some
revision and/or correction is needed or work is not always completed in the
manner required.

Work
provided constantly needs correction and revision and is often incomplete.

Time-management

All work
is turned in on time or even earlier than what is needed, the team member is
reliable for posting/submitting whole pieces that the group has put together
and responsibilities never need to be reassigned to compensate

Work is,
for the most part, on time and on a few occasions early. For the most part,
the team member is reliable for submitting completed team documents. Group
member does not need to be compensated for.

Occasionally
the work is on time, and rarely is it early. On one or two occasions, the
rest of the group needed to compensate for missing or late work.

Occasionally
the work is on time and is never early. Team member cannot be relied on to
turn in team documents and other members sometimes must compensate for
tardiness of work assigned.

Attitude

Always
has a positive attitude about the project and works well with the other team
members. Any criticism given is constructive.

Usually
has a positive attitude towards the work and group, but conflict is usually
minor. Any criticism is often constructive.

Attitude
is hit or miss towards project and group, but member is for the most part
tolerable. Criticism given is on occasion constructive if at all given.

Rarely
has a positive attitude. Participation, quality of work, and time management
is severely affected by such and team member has difficulties and conflict
with group

After the total for each
student has been added together, and divided by the number of team members
rating him/her; calculate the following:
___/100 x 2.5% =____ out of2.5 points for this evaluation.
Complete the peer evaluation form. In considering what score to award each member, reflect upon communication styles, conflict-management style, decision-making ability, leadership role, as well as the quality of work and effort exerted into making the project successful.PEER EVALUATION Complete this peer evaluation for each
member of your team, including yourself. The average score from these
evaluations will be your grade for the assignment. Rate each team member on a scale of 1 to 100
with 100 being highest. Use the rubric on the second page to determine the
score for each team member. Include comments explaining why you gave your
teammate this score. Your peer evaluations will be kept strictly
confidential. Your grade for the evaluation will be posted in the Grade book
as an assignment, but individual ratings will not be shared.Group member: List namesRating: 1 – 100Comments: Must be completed for each
team member1. Your
name2. 3.4.5.6.

CATEGORY
100-93 pts (A) Excellent 92-83 pts (B) Good 82-73 pts (C) Improving 72-0 pts (D) Needs
Improvement Contributions Routinely provides useful
ideas when participating in the group discussion. Contributes a lot of
effort. Usually provides useful
ideas when participating in the group discussion. A good group member who
tries hard. Sometimes provides useful
ideas when participating in the group discussion. A satisfactory group member
who does what is required. Rarely provides useful ideas
when participating in the group discussion. May refuse to participate. Quality of Work No
correction or revision necessary, work is complete and of high quality.Revisions
and corrections may not be necessary and work is adequate for what is needed.Some
revision and/or correction is needed or work is not always completed in the
manner required.Work
provided constantly needs correction and revision and is often incomplete.Time-management All work
is turned in on time or even earlier than what is needed, the team member is
reliable for posting/submitting whole pieces that the group has put together
and responsibilities never need to be reassigned to compensateWork is,
for the most part, on time and on a few occasions early. For the most part,
the team member is reliable for submitting completed team documents. Group
member does not need to be compensated for.Occasionally
the work is on time, and rarely is it early. On one or two occasions, the
rest of the group needed to compensate for missing or late work.Occasionally
the work is on time and is never early. Team member cannot be relied on to
turn in team documents and other members sometimes must compensate for
tardiness of work assigned.Attitude Always
has a positive attitude about the project and works well with the other team
members. Any criticism given is constructive.Usually
has a positive attitude towards the work and group, but conflict is usually
minor. Any criticism is often constructive.Attitude
is hit or miss towards project and group, but member is for the most part
tolerable. Criticism given is on occasion constructive if at all given.Rarely
has a positive attitude. Participation, quality of work, and time management
is severely affected by such and team member has difficulties and conflict
with groupAfter the total for each
student has been added together, and divided by the number of team members
rating him/her; calculate the following:
___/100 x 2.5% =____ out of2.5 points for this evaluation.