Day # 3
PIF GDP Program – Assessment Week – GRC
Duration : 7 hours (Including the two breaks)
Timing : 10.00 am to 5:00 pm
Startrek Corporation
Startrek Corporation was an energy, commodities, and services company based in New York. In the
late 2000s, it was one of the largest companies in the world, widely admired for its innovation and
rapid growth.
Startrek Corporation, began its journey as a modest energy company. Founded by Daniel Emerl,
Startek quickly rose to prominence in the energy trading market, pioneering new strategies and
technologies that revolutionized the industry. Under the leadership of CEO Jenifer D Skin and CFO
Andrew Williams, Startrek embarked on an ambitious expansion plan, diversifying its operations into
various sectors beyond energy.
Under the leadership of Daniel Emerl, the company’s founder, Startrek leveraged SPEs to diversify its
investments and pursue growth opportunities beyond its traditional energy trading market. By
establishing separate legal entities with their own distinct assets and liabilities, Startrek could pursue
ventures in new sectors while minimizing the impact on its overall financial health.
These entities, typically created for a specific purpose or project, allowed Startrek to
compartmentalize certain assets, liabilities, and risks, thereby shielding its core operations from
potential volatility or adverse outcomes.
Startrek engaged in long-term energy contracts or derivatives agreements, marking them to their
estimated market value at the time of reporting. This approach enabled Startrek to promptly recognize
potential future profits from these contracts on its financial statements, rather than deferring
recognition until the profits were realized over time. No questions were raised on the workings of
these contracts by any internal or external stakeholder.
While mark-to-market accounting provided Startrek with flexibility and agility in assessing its financial
position, it also posed risks. The inherent volatility of energy and commodities markets meant that the
estimated market values of contracts could fluctuate widely, impacting the company’s reported
earnings and financial health.
Startek’s success was fueled by its innovative practices, including the creation of complex financial
structures such as Special Purpose Entities (SPEs) to manage risk and maximize profits. These offbalance-sheet entities allowed Startek to conceal debt and inflate earnings, painting a rosy picture of
financial health to investors and analysts alike. The company had been providing financials of the
SPEs in the annual report, though they had secured the exemption to present the consolidated
financial statement.
The company established an audit committee, but its members lacked the necessary background or
experience to grasp the complexities of these transactions and financial statements. Furthermore, the
financials were adopted and approved at shareholder meetings without any questions or objections.
1
WWW.KAPLANPROFESSIONALME.COM
The board of the company was well composed but they have been failing to meet periodically. Most of
the time, key members of the board have been found to be missing from the meetings and have also
abstained from voting on some of the critical management decisions.
The internal and external auditors of the company have been with the company for over a decade.
They personally know most of the senior management and are often seen to hangout socially.
The scope of the internal auditor has also been limited and not reviewed since the date of their
appointment.
The lender has been getting their repayment on time though most the reporting requirements, as per
the loan sanction letter, have been failing. Since banks have been getting their repayment on
schedule they did not bother to raise the voice for reporting.
The financial performance of the company over the last three years has been , as follows
Income Statement ($ Mn)
Particulars
Revenues
Cost of Revenues
FY 1998
31,260.00
-29,562.00
1,698.00
5%
-912.00
786.00
3%
96.00
-3.00
882.03
3%
FY 1999
42,223.00
-38,266.00
3,957.00
9%
-3,058.00
899.00
2%
124.00
-60.00
1,023.02
2%
FY 2000
1,00,789.00
-94,361.00
6,428.00
6%
-5,066.00
1,362.00
1%
297.00
-117.00
1,659.01
2%
Particulars
Fixed Assets
Deposits
Accounts Receivables
Bank A/c
Total Assets
FY 1998
85,155
30,000
17,150
696
1,33,001
FY 1999
85,155
45,000
34,041
1,200
1,65,396
FY 2000
85,155
60,000
91,803
3,610
2,40,568
Current Liabilities
Secured Loan
Unsecured Loan
Capital
Total Liability
636
7,583
1,500
1,23,282
1,33,001
2,890
7,583
31,500
1,23,423
1,65,396
24,426
7,583
84,500
1,24,059
2,40,568
Gross Profit
Oprating Expenses
Operating Profit
Other Income
Finance Cost
Net Income
Balance Sheet ($ Mn)
2
WWW.KAPLANPROFESSIONALME.COM
Despite its outward success, cracks began to appear in Startek’s facade. Concerns arose over the
company’s opaque financial disclosures, aggressive accounting practices, and rapid expansion into
unfamiliar territories. Startek’s stock price soared to unprecedented heights, but doubts lingered about
the sustainability of its growth model.
As Startek’s financial web grew increasingly tangled, so too did the risks. Executives, driven by greed
and hubris, engaged in fraudulent activities to maintain the illusion of prosperity. Internal auditors,
extensively trading the shares of the company, also concealed the facts. Insider dealing, conflicts of
interest, and manipulation of financial statements became commonplace, eroding the company’s
integrity from within.
Regulatory agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), failed to detect and
prevent Startrek’s fraudulent activities, highlighting weaknesses in the regulatory framework and
enforcement mechanisms.
In December 2001, Startek’s house of cards came crashing down. The company filed for bankruptcy,
shocking the financial world and sending shockwaves through global markets. Thousands of
employees lost their jobs, pensions evaporated, and investors saw their savings vanish overnight.
The Startek scandal, once considered the pride of American capitalism, became a cautionary tale of
corporate greed, deception, and hubris.
The Startrek scandal led to increased scrutiny of corporate governance practices and regulatory
reforms, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
3
WWW.KAPLANPROFESSIONALME.COM
Reflect
1. Please read the case study carefully and identify 5 red flags you come across. (5 Marks,
One for each correct answer)
One has been done for your reference.
Answer
SN
1
2
3
4
5
6
Red Flags (One Mark Each)
Non transparency (Opaque) in financial disclosure
2. For each of the five risks identified in question 1, suggest 2 control measures. (10 marks, 2 for
each of the correct control measures identified for the 5 risks.)
One has been done for your reference.
Answer
SN
1
2
3
4
5
6
4
Red Flags
Non transparency (Opaque) in financial
disclosure
Control
accounts and audit committee who
shall review and approve the
accounting polices and practices
being followed.
internal and external auditor,
commenting on the financial
disclosure and compliance with the
guidance / requirement of the
respective authorities.
WWW.KAPLANPROFESSIONALME.COM
3. Identify 3 triggers, based on the given financials (3 marks, 1 for each of the correct triggers
identified), and suggest 3 controls for each of them (9 marks, 1 for each of the correct
controls suggested for the 3 triggers).
(Total: 12 Marks).
One has been done for your reference.
Answer
Trigger (1
Mark Each)
Controls
Inflated
revenues
with no
improvement
in margins
Check orders confirming to revenue
Analyse and satisfy the reasons for increased revenue
Check collection / aging of debtors
Check communication with debtors in case of delayed realisation
Check regulatory filings to cross check reported revenue
Check trends (Is it year-end / quarter end sales?)
Check third party statement
4. Identify 1 right for each of the stakeholders in the list below? (5 marks, One mark for each
correct answer). Total (5 Marks)
One has been done for your reference.
Answer
Right (1 Mark Each)
Stakeholder
•
•
•
Board
Right to create committees
Right to Appoint and Remove Officers including auditors
Right of overseeing Governance and Management
Shareholders
Internal Auditors
External Auditors
5
WWW.KAPLANPROFESSIONALME.COM
Lenders
Employees
5. Do you think if all or any of them had exercised the rights at the proper time, the situation
would have been different? (5 Marks, one for each correct identification). Please justify
considering facts from the case (10 marks, 2 marks for each correct justification). (Total:
15 Marks).
One has been done for your reference.
Answer
Right Exercised (Yes
/ No) – 1 Mark Each
Stakeholder
No.
Board
Justify based on the case – 2 Marks Each
Board failed to design and maintain the
required governance
Shareholders
Internal Auditors
External Auditors
Lenders
Employees
6
WWW.KAPLANPROFESSIONALME.COM
6. Identify 3 major failures on the part of the internal auditors (3 Marks)? Please explain and
highlight the implications for the 3 failures identified. (6 Marks, 1 each for explanation and
implication for the 3 failures identified. (Total 9 marks)
One has been done for your reference.
Answer
Failure (1 Mark Each)
Explanation (1 Mark Each)
Inadequate Risk
Assessment
Failed to conduct
comprehensive risk
assessments to identify and
evaluate the various risks –
–
risks related to financial
reporting,
compliance ,
operational processes, and
strategic initiatives
–
7
WWW.KAPLANPROFESSIONALME.COM
Implications (1 Mark Each)
Without a thorough
understanding of these risks,
internal auditors may not have
been able to
–
prioritize audit activities
effectively or
evaluate and implement
appropriate controls to
mitigate risks
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
