Site icon UK Essayz

Peer-Reviewed Journal Article Analysis Component Example Article Title (A

Peer-Reviewed
Journal Article Analysis

Component
Example

Article Title (APA Citation)

Cited
in analysis

Reference page with article reference

Brumandl, R., Kemper, A., &
Kossman, D. (2003, November
2003). Quality of service in an information economy.
ACM Transactions on Internet
Technology, 3,
4.
Retrieved
October 13, 2002, ACM Digital library.

Article Summary/Abstract (In your
words)

This article examines the response
time or quality of service associated with query processing via the
Internet. The integration of a
distributed query processor is examined as a way to improve Quality of
Service during query processing.

Is the
purpose of article and research problem clearly identified?
What was
the main theme of the paper?
What new ideas or information were communicated in the
paper? Why was it important to publish these ideas?

The purpose of the article is
clearly identified in the article and introduction sections of the
article. The article delves into
extensive technical detail related to database performance along with quality
and cost parameters that may be specified by the owner of the query plan.

Did the author clearly define the research process used in
their article?
What
methods did the authors use to reach conclusions? If this is an experiment or
survey, how were the data collected and analyzed?
Who were
the subjects? What were the basic results or findings from the research? If
this is an opinion paper, where did the author find his or her opinions?
If this is a technical paper, how do you know that the
material is accurate?
Give your impressions of the
usefulness of the paper. Give your
reasons for your

The research conducted in the article is primarily
secondary in nature as the authors made extensive use of primary articles for
their data and analysis.

opinions.
Write about your opinions of the strengths and weaknesses
of the paper in separate paragraphs.

Does the author of the study protect the participants in
the study and is the scope of the study clearly defined?

Since the authors did not do the primary research for the
data in these articles, the participants creating the query requests remained
completely anonymous.

Did the author adequately define
the limitations of the study and how these limitations could have an impact
on the finding of the study?

The
authors of this study did not identify any limitation but it would seem that
the limitation would be in the form of the data for this study was not
directly completed by the authors as they relied primarily on the research of
others. It is believed that the
authors of the article did not adequately take into account the hardware
capabilities and the network connections of the end users performing the
queries.

Can the findings of this article be applied to the needs
of the research in progress? Were the findings important to a reader?
Were the
conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?
If the material was technical, was the technical material
innovative?

To a certain extent, the findings
and recommendations can be applied to query processing if the end user has
the proper tools to set the query limits and to abort the query if any of the
quality of service parameters is out of limits. However, in the experience of this learner,
most end users performing Internet query do not have the software necessary
to set the query limits.

Is the data and finding of this
article sufficiently current to be applicable to the research in progress?

Although the article is being
published in the November 2003 issue of an ACM publication, most of the
references predate 2000. Only one
reference is dated in 2000 and there are several from 1992. In general, this reviewer believes the age
of the references for this article must be considered in the relevance to
todays computing and information systems environment. The technical details
of this particular article would not be appropriate for the research being
conducted by this learner.

Does the
author present their findings and recommendation in an unbiased manner?

Yes
these authors analyzed the data presented in an unbiased and quantitative
manner. For example.

Are the findings consistent with
the purpose of the research and the title of the article?

In general, the article drills down into some technical
areas that would not be of interest to most readers attracted by the title of
the article. To some extent, this
article concentrated on database and query language details that go beyond
the broader

title of the article. The performance and response calculations
presented are not usually of interest to information systems professional as
much as they would be to computer engineers and scientists.

Are the
conclusions presented from the data presented in the study and the analysis
performed justified to support the recommendations?

The
conclusions presented by the authors would appear to be supported by the
analysis of the data presented. The
authors only presented conclusions not recommendations as to course of
actions to be taken.

Are the researchers background, experience and
credentials presented with the report?

This
article did not provide information on the background, experience and
credentials on the authors of the article.

Peer-Reviewed
Journal Article Analysis Component
Example
Article Title (APA Citation)-
Cited
in analysis –
Reference page with article referenceBrumandl, R., Kemper, A., &
Kossman, D. (2003, November2003). Quality of service in an information economy.ACM Transactions on Internet
Technology, 3,
4.Retrieved
October 13, 2002, ACM Digital library.Article Summary/Abstract (In your
words)This article examines the response
time or quality of service associated with query processing via the
Internet. The integration of a
distributed query processor is examined as a way to improve Quality of
Service during query processing.Is the
purpose of article and research problem clearly identified?What was
the main theme of the paper?What new ideas or information were communicated in the
paper? Why was it important to publish these ideas?The purpose of the article is
clearly identified in the article and introduction sections of the
article. The article delves into
extensive technical detail related to database performance along with quality
and cost parameters that may be specified by the owner of the query plan.Did the author clearly define the research process used in
their article? What
methods did the authors use to reach conclusions? If this is an experiment or
survey, how were the data collected and analyzed?Who were
the subjects? What were the basic results or findings from the research? If
this is an opinion paper, where did the author find his or her opinions?If this is a technical paper, how do you know that the
material is accurate?Give your impressions of the
usefulness of the paper. Give your
reasons for yourThe research conducted in the article is primarily
secondary in nature as the authors made extensive use of primary articles for
their data and analysis.opinions. Write about your opinions of the strengths and weaknesses
of the paper in separate paragraphs.Does the author of the study protect the participants in
the study and is the scope of the study clearly defined?Since the authors did not do the primary research for the
data in these articles, the participants creating the query requests remained
completely anonymous. Did the author adequately define
the limitations of the study and how these limitations could have an impact
on the finding of the study?The
authors of this study did not identify any limitation but it would seem that
the limitation would be in the form of the data for this study was not
directly completed by the authors as they relied primarily on the research of
others. It is believed that the
authors of the article did not adequately take into account the hardware
capabilities and the network connections of the end users performing the
queries.Can the findings of this article be applied to the needs
of the research in progress? Were the findings important to a reader?Were the
conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?If the material was technical, was the technical material
innovative? To a certain extent, the findings
and recommendations can be applied to query processing if the end user has
the proper tools to set the query limits and to abort the query if any of the
quality of service parameters is out of limits. However, in the experience of this learner,
most end users performing Internet query do not have the software necessary
to set the query limits. Is the data and finding of this
article sufficiently current to be applicable to the research in progress?Although the article is being
published in the November 2003 issue of an ACM publication, most of the
references predate 2000. Only one
reference is dated in 2000 and there are several from 1992. In general, this reviewer believes the age
of the references for this article must be considered in the relevance to
todays computing and information systems environment. The technical details
of this particular article would not be appropriate for the research being
conducted by this learner.Does the
author present their findings and recommendation in an unbiased manner?Yes
these authors analyzed the data presented in an unbiased and quantitative
manner. For example.Are the findings consistent with
the purpose of the research and the title of the article?In general, the article drills down into some technical
areas that would not be of interest to most readers attracted by the title of
the article. To some extent, this
article concentrated on database and query language details that go beyond
the broadertitle of the article. The performance and response calculations
presented are not usually of interest to information systems professional as
much as they would be to computer engineers and scientists.Are the
conclusions presented from the data presented in the study and the analysis
performed justified to support the recommendations?The
conclusions presented by the authors would appear to be supported by the
analysis of the data presented. The
authors only presented conclusions not recommendations as to course of
actions to be taken.Are the researchers background, experience and
credentials presented with the report?This
article did not provide information on the background, experience and
credentials on the authors of the article.