MGT 4670
Executive Leadership
Case Study
Instructions
Instructions:
There will be five case studies (listed below) completed in
the course. The goal of the case study assignments are to strategically
evaluate the students knowledge on a variety of topics covered in the text by
use of a real-world scenario. Since the cases used in the course are brief in
nature the student must answer each of the questions at the end of the case
study with theories and concepts from the textbook in mind. The case study
assignments are to be completed individually by the student, no group work is
allowed. It is mandatory that the answers to the case studies questions exhibit
critical thinking and theoretical rationale. The page length for each of the case
studies will range between 3 and 5 pages depending on the case details. The
content of the written work in the case studies should be free of grammatical
and spelling errors and commensurate with college level scholarship and
critical thinking skills. Each assignment should include a title page and a
reference page (if sources are used not a requirement, but allowed). The
title page and reference page do not count toward the minimum page requirement
of 3 pages of body. The paper should fully comply to APA format (6th
edition). The rubric provided below will be used to grade each case study.
Case Study Grading
Rubric:
.png”>Competency
Unacceptable
Weight = 20%
Acceptable
Weight = 28%
Excellent
Weight = 33.3%
Application of
leadership concepts
1.
Applies knowledge with little consistency or accuracy
2.
Seeks basic alternative solutions
3.
Applies procedures and concepts to familiar tasks with
limited accuracy but not to unfamiliar tasks
1.
Applies knowledge with some degree of accuracy
2.
Seeks relevant solutions for problem
3.
Applies procedures and concepts to familiar tasks but
might have difficulty with unfamiliar tasks
1.
Applies knowledge consistently and accurately
2.
Seeks extensive solutions for problem
3.
Applies procedures and concepts to familiar and
unfamiliar tasks
Analysis of
leadership concepts
1.
Draws conclusions with difficulty
2.
Distinguishes relevant from irrelevant information with
difficulty
3.
Breaks down theories and arguments into their elements
with difficulty
4.
Demonstrates minimal awareness of ones or anothers
biases, assumptions or values
1.
Draws conclusions with minimal difficulty
2.
Distinguishes relevant from irrelevant information with
minimal difficulty
3.
Breaks down theories and arguments into their elements
with minimal difficulty
4.
Demonstrates some awareness of ones or anothers
biases, assumptions or values
1.
Draws well-reasoned conclusions consistently
2.
Distinguishes relevant from irrelevant information
easily
3.
Breaks down theories and arguments into their elements
with accuracy
4.
Demonstrates awareness of ones or anothers biases,
assumptions or values
Synthesis of
leadership concepts
1.
Draws inconsistent or incomplete generalizations
2.
Generates new ideas from existing information
inaccurately or inconsistently
3.
Integrates relevant knowledge from diverse perspectives
with little depth
1.
Draws generalizations that are partially consistent
2.
Generates new ideas from existing information with some
accuracy or consistency
3.
Integrates relevant knowledge from diverse perspectives
with some depth
1.
Draws generalizations that are consistent and
supportable
2.
Generates new ideas from existing information with
accuracy and consistency
3.
Integrates relevant knowledge from diverse perspectives
with depth and breadth
MGT 4670
Executive LeadershipCase Study
InstructionsInstructions:There will be five case studies (listed below) completed in
the course. The goal of the case study assignments are to strategically
evaluate the students knowledge on a variety of topics covered in the text by
use of a real-world scenario. Since the cases used in the course are brief in
nature the student must answer each of the questions at the end of the case
study with theories and concepts from the textbook in mind. The case study
assignments are to be completed individually by the student, no group work is
allowed. It is mandatory that the answers to the case studies questions exhibit
critical thinking and theoretical rationale. The page length for each of the case
studies will range between 3 and 5 pages depending on the case details. The
content of the written work in the case studies should be free of grammatical
and spelling errors and commensurate with college level scholarship and
critical thinking skills. Each assignment should include a title page and a
reference page (if sources are used not a requirement, but allowed). The
title page and reference page do not count toward the minimum page requirement
of 3 pages of body. The paper should fully comply to APA format (6th
edition). The rubric provided below will be used to grade each case study.Case Study Grading
Rubric: .png”>CompetencyUnacceptableWeight = 20%AcceptableWeight = 28%ExcellentWeight = 33.3%Application of
leadership concepts1.
Applies knowledge with little consistency or accuracy2.
Seeks basic alternative solutions 3.
Applies procedures and concepts to familiar tasks with
limited accuracy but not to unfamiliar tasks1.
Applies knowledge with some degree of accuracy2.
Seeks relevant solutions for problem3.
Applies procedures and concepts to familiar tasks but
might have difficulty with unfamiliar tasks1.
Applies knowledge consistently and accurately2.
Seeks extensive solutions for problem 3.
Applies procedures and concepts to familiar and
unfamiliar tasksAnalysis of
leadership concepts1.
Draws conclusions with difficulty2.
Distinguishes relevant from irrelevant information with
difficulty3.
Breaks down theories and arguments into their elements
with difficulty4.
Demonstrates minimal awareness of ones or anothers
biases, assumptions or values 1.
Draws conclusions with minimal difficulty2.
Distinguishes relevant from irrelevant information with
minimal difficulty3.
Breaks down theories and arguments into their elements
with minimal difficulty4.
Demonstrates some awareness of ones or anothers
biases, assumptions or values 1.
Draws well-reasoned conclusions consistently2.
Distinguishes relevant from irrelevant information
easily3.
Breaks down theories and arguments into their elements
with accuracy4.
Demonstrates awareness of ones or anothers biases,
assumptions or values Synthesis of
leadership concepts1.
Draws inconsistent or incomplete generalizations 2.
Generates new ideas from existing information
inaccurately or inconsistently3.
Integrates relevant knowledge from diverse perspectives
with little depth 1.
Draws generalizations that are partially consistent 2.
Generates new ideas from existing information with some
accuracy or consistency3.
Integrates relevant knowledge from diverse perspectives
with some depth 1.
Draws generalizations that are consistent and
supportable 2.
Generates new ideas from existing information with
accuracy and consistency3.
Integrates relevant knowledge from diverse perspectives
with depth and breadth
