HMGT 310 Healthcare Regulation Impact
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
Turnitin® enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Instructions
Assignment #3: Health Care Regulation Impact (16 points)
Select a state regulation from a state of your choice on one of the below topics. Prepare an annotated copy of the regulation, including the sections you reviewed to answer the questions in the following format:
Prepare a three (3) to four (4) page written response addressing all information in the following table. Text must be double spaced. Also include a cover page and a reference page in APA Format (these do not count toward the page limit). Review the bolded text in the Class Guidelines section of the syllabus above for formatting requirements.
Highlight five (5) notable parts of the regulation. For each of the parts, describe how the patient, provider, product developer, health care organization and/or payer may be impacted. Remember to write in narrative format except for titles. No more than 15% of direct quotes or paraphrasing are permitted in the document. Use citations and attach the notated regulation. In Week Five, you need to sign up for a topic in the Assignment Three Topic Selection folder in LEO. Unless the professor reaches out to you directly, your chosen topic is approved. Note a maximum of five (5) students may select the same topic. The topics are as follows:
CLARIFICATION: You need to select ONE specific state regulation/law from ONE state that addresses your chosen topic. Then highlight/select FIVE notable parts of the regulation. Then, in a paper format (NOT in the table), answer all the inquiries from the table. That includes analyzing all five parts of the regulation and its impact on the noted stakeholders in the table.
HGMT 310 Assignment #3
Student Name:
Type your name here.
Assignment #3 Title:
Provide a unique short name for the paper and the official title of the state regulation.
Agency Responsible:
Identify the state agency and subunit (such as a bureau or office) responsible for oversight of the regulation.
Incentives and Enforcement:
What enforcements and penalties are noted in the regulation? Is there training for personnel? Is Technical Assistance (funding, training, resources) provided?
Key Aspect of the Regulation #1:
How does this section of the regulation impact payers/insurers/health plans, health care professionals, health provider organizations, or health product developers?
Key Aspect of the Regulation #2:
How does this section of the regulation impact payers/insurers/health plans, health care professionals, health provider organizations, or health product developers?
Key Aspect of the Regulation #3:
How does this section of the regulation impact payers/insurers/health plans, health care professionals, health provider organizations, or health product developers?
Key Aspect of the Regulation #4:
How does this section of the regulation impact payers/insurers/health plans, health care professionals, health provider organizations, or health product developers?
Key Aspect of the Regulation #5:
How does this section of the regulation impact payers/insurers/health plans, health care professionals, health provider organizations, or health product developers?
Notated Copy of the Rules:
Attach a copy of the regulation that you have marked up. Underline, highlight or note key sections. Mark them (1), (2), (3), etc. You may use technology to mark up in PDF or print, handwrite and scan the regulation. Specifically:
1. Print out the regulation, write in notes and/or highlight the printed copy, use a scanner to scan in the document in PDF format, and then attach to the back of your paper, or submit as a separate, second file online.
OR
2. Save the regulation in PDF format (you could copy the text and paste into Word, then Save As a PDF file). Open up Adobe Acrobat and add comments and/or highlights via the Comments function. Then attach to the back of your paper or submit as a separate, second file online.
The grading rubric for this assignment appears below, if you opened the Assignment in the Assignment Folder. It can be opened by clicking on the ‘Written Assignment Rubric’ tab in the lower right corner of the screen, if you opened the Assignment in Content.
This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.Criteria
Outstanding
Superior
Good
Below Standard
Failure
Criterion Score
Critical Thinking/Reasoning
35 points
demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; provides thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions
31.15 points
shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions
27.65 points
shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion
21 points
shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions
5 points
lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims
Score of Critical Thinking/Reasoning,/ 35Criterion score has been overridden
Application of Concepts/Development
35 points
arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts
31.15 points
arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate students understanding of the material and concepts
27.65 points
arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material
21 points
arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material
0 points
There is no meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas
Score of Application of Concepts/Development,/ 35Criterion score has been overridden
Attention to Instructions
15 points
demonstrated full understanding of requirements; responded to each aspect of assignment
13.35 points
demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment
11.85 points
demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment
9 points
failed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment
0 points
did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements
Score of Attention to Instructions,/ 15Criterion score has been overridden
Clarity; grammar & APA
15 points
writing is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability, no APA style errors
13.35 points
most ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issues, attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present
11.85 points
wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar, attempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document
9 points
unclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issues, attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other
5 points
Very difficult to understand, poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure
Score of Clarity; grammar & APA,/ 15Criterion score has been overridden
Rubric Total ScoreTotal
Score of Written Assignment Rubric,/ 100Criterion score has been overridden
Overall Score
Overall Score
Outstanding100 points minimum
Superior90 points minimum
Good70 points minimum
Below Standard60 points minimum
Failure0 points minimum
