Site icon UK Essayz

BCO118 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY

BCO118 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY

FINAL ASSIGNMENT:
For this Final Assignment, worth 60% of the final mark, the student must carry out the following work:

Task Scenario for 2050
Every student must work on a personalized approach to a scenario which must be individual; two or more students cannot work together to produce identical analyses and conclusions.

Your task is to prepare an exploratory scenario for 2050 (cf: Living Planet Report 2018 pp 124- 125), taking into account the topics and issues covered during the course. Your Exploratory Scenario 2050 should:

1. outline the current critical issues which will impact on human life and health in the decade beginning 2050

2. be based on realistic expectations of goals and results arising from governmental, organizational and individual actions

3. describe the potential outcomes of specific environmental strategies that are currently under consideration

4. analyse the current and potential challenges that might hinder the implementation of such strategies

5. summarise and conclude what new initiatives need to be taken at the three levels (governmental, organizational and individual)

You may decide on a minimum of two core issues/topics of your choice to cover in your scenario. Whilst your scenario can include any topics covered in the course, a good starting point is the Living Planet Report 2018.

For your answer, you must provide a logical analysis by drawing on cases and/or theories covered during this course and/or which you learned about through your independent study. Your answers must illustrate flow and progression of ideas through critical and independent thought. Any answer given by you that is identical to an answer given by another student will lead to a down-grade of the answer in question.

REQUIREMENTS
Formalities:

· Wordcount: 1,500 words; Cover page, Table of Contents, Bibliography and Annexes are excluded of the total wordcount.

· Font: Arial 12 pts.

· The in-text references and the bibliography have to be in the Harvard citation style. This includes also for graphic images, tables and photos taken from other sources.

Graduate Program Assessment Brief Academic Year 2020-2021

Page | 1

Thank you.

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
The work must be on one single Word.docx document and must be uploaded on the appropriate Turnitin folder created by the course Faculty Member on Moodle.

The title of the student’s submitted file should contain the following information:

· Name of this course

· Name of the Faculty Member / Teacher

· Student’s full Name

· Student ID number

· Title of this assignment (Mid-Term / Final)

Release Date: As of Week 5.

Submission Deadline: Week 8: at the latest on Sunday, November 29th – 23:59 – Via Moodle (Turnitin).

Weight: This task contributes 60% to your total grade for this course.

GRADING CRITERIA
(Grading matrix/rubric next page)

Exceptional 90-100

Good 80-89

Fair 70-79

Marginal fail 60-69

Knowledge &

Student

Student

Student understands

Student understands

Understanding

demonstrates

demonstrates good

the task and provides

the task and attempts

(20%)

excellent

understanding of the

minimum conceptual

to answer the question

understanding of the

task and mentions

and theoretical

but does not mention

task, the key

some relevant

support, and uses

key concepts or uses

concepts, applies

concepts and

only some of the

minimum amount of

theory where useful

demonstrates use of

relevant vocabulary.

relevant vocabulary.

or necessary, and

the relevant

uses vocabulary in an

vocabulary.

entirely appropriate

manner.

Application

Student applies fully

Student applies

Student applies some

Student applies little

(30%)

relevant knowledge

mostly relevant

relevant knowledge

relevant knowledge

from the topics

knowledge from the

from the topics

from the topics

delivered in class.

topics delivered in

delivered in class.

delivered in class.

class.

Misunderstanding

Misunderstanding is

may be evident.

evident.

Critical Thinking

Student critically

Student critically

Student provides

Student shows little or

(30%)

assesses in excellent

assesses in good

some insights but

no critical thinking

ways, drawing

ways, drawing

stays on the surface

insights, does not

insightful conclusions

conclusions from

of the topic.

quote appropriate

based on readings

relevant authors and

References may not

authors, and does not

from relevant

references. Student

be relevant.

provide valid sources.

authors. Student also

knows how to use

makes clear and

the Harvard

correct citations and

referencing method

uses the Harvard

correctly.

referencing method

correctly.

Communication

Student

Student

Student

Student communicates

(20%)

communicates their

communicates their

communicates their

their ideas in a

ideas very well

ideas in an organized

ideas with some

somewhat unclear and

organized and

manner and

clarity and concision.

unconcise way. Does

extremely clearly and

concisely, respecting

It may be slightly

not reach or does

concisely, respecting

word count,

over or under the

exceed wordcount

word count, grammar

grammar and

wordcount limit.

excessively and

and spellcheck.

spellcheck

Some misspelling

misspelling errors are

errors may be

evident.

evident.

Applied Sciences
Architecture and Design
Biology
Business & Finance
Chemistry
Computer Science
Geography
Geology
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental science
Spanish
Government
History
Human Resource Management
Information Systems
Law
Literature
Mathematics
Nursing
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Reading
Science
Social Science
Home
Homework Answers
Blog
Archive
Tags
Reviews
Contact
twitterfacebook
Copyright © 2021 SweetStudy.comSWEETSTUDY.COM – YOUR HOMEWORK ANSWERS
chat0
Home.Literature.
Help.
Log in / Sign up
environmental sustainability
profile
angei112

FinalAssignmentBriefandInstructions.docx
Home>Environmental science homework help>environmental sustainability
BCO118 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY

FINAL ASSIGNMENT:
For this Final Assignment, worth 60% of the final mark, the student must carry out the following work:

Task Scenario for 2050
Every student must work on a personalized approach to a scenario which must be individual; two or more students cannot work together to produce identical analyses and conclusions.

Your task is to prepare an exploratory scenario for 2050 (cf: Living Planet Report 2018 pp 124- 125), taking into account the topics and issues covered during the course. Your Exploratory Scenario 2050 should:

1. outline the current critical issues which will impact on human life and health in the decade beginning 2050

2. be based on realistic expectations of goals and results arising from governmental, organizational and individual actions

3. describe the potential outcomes of specific environmental strategies that are currently under consideration

4. analyse the current and potential challenges that might hinder the implementation of such strategies

5. summarise and conclude what new initiatives need to be taken at the three levels (governmental, organizational and individual)

You may decide on a minimum of two core issues/topics of your choice to cover in your scenario. Whilst your scenario can include any topics covered in the course, a good starting point is the Living Planet Report 2018.

For your answer, you must provide a logical analysis by drawing on cases and/or theories covered during this course and/or which you learned about through your independent study. Your answers must illustrate flow and progression of ideas through critical and independent thought. Any answer given by you that is identical to an answer given by another student will lead to a down-grade of the answer in question.

REQUIREMENTS
Formalities:

· Wordcount: 1,500 words; Cover page, Table of Contents, Bibliography and Annexes are excluded of the total wordcount.

· Font: Arial 12 pts.

· The in-text references and the bibliography have to be in the Harvard citation style. This includes also for graphic images, tables and photos taken from other sources.

Graduate Program Assessment Brief Academic Year 2020-2021

Page | 1

Thank you.

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
The work must be on one single Word.docx document and must be uploaded on the appropriate Turnitin folder created by the course Faculty Member on Moodle.

The title of the student’s submitted file should contain the following information:

· Name of this course

· Name of the Faculty Member / Teacher

· Student’s full Name

· Student ID number

· Title of this assignment (Mid-Term / Final)

Release Date: As of Week 5.

Submission Deadline: Week 8: at the latest on Sunday, November 29th – 23:59 – Via Moodle (Turnitin).

Weight: This task contributes 60% to your total grade for this course.

GRADING CRITERIA
(Grading matrix/rubric next page)

Exceptional 90-100

Good 80-89

Fair 70-79

Marginal fail 60-69

Knowledge &

Student

Student

Student understands

Student understands

Understanding

demonstrates

demonstrates good

the task and provides

the task and attempts

(20%)

excellent

understanding of the

minimum conceptual

to answer the question

understanding of the

task and mentions

and theoretical

but does not mention

task, the key

some relevant

support, and uses

key concepts or uses

concepts, applies

concepts and

only some of the

minimum amount of

theory where useful

demonstrates use of

relevant vocabulary.

relevant vocabulary.

or necessary, and

the relevant

uses vocabulary in an

vocabulary.

entirely appropriate

manner.

Application

Student applies fully

Student applies

Student applies some

Student applies little

(30%)

relevant knowledge

mostly relevant

relevant knowledge

relevant knowledge

from the topics

knowledge from the

from the topics

from the topics

delivered in class.

topics delivered in

delivered in class.

delivered in class.

class.

Misunderstanding

Misunderstanding is

may be evident.

evident.

Critical Thinking

Student critically

Student critically

Student provides

Student shows little or

(30%)

assesses in excellent

assesses in good

some insights but

no critical thinking

ways, drawing

ways, drawing

stays on the surface

insights, does not

insightful conclusions

conclusions from

of the topic.

quote appropriate

based on readings

relevant authors and

References may not

authors, and does not

from relevant

references. Student

be relevant.

provide valid sources.

authors. Student also

knows how to use

makes clear and

the Harvard

correct citations and

referencing method

uses the Harvard

correctly.

referencing method

correctly.

Communication

Student

Student

Student

Student communicates

(20%)

communicates their

communicates their

communicates their

their ideas in a

ideas very well

ideas in an organized

ideas with some

somewhat unclear and

organized and

manner and

clarity and concision.

unconcise way. Does

extremely clearly and

concisely, respecting

It may be slightly

not reach or does

concisely, respecting

word count,

over or under the

exceed wordcount

word count, grammar

grammar and

wordcount limit.

excessively and

and spellcheck.

spellcheck

Some misspelling

misspelling errors are

errors may be

evident.

evident.

Applied Sciences
Architecture and Design
Biology
Business & Finance
Chemistry
Computer Science
Geography
Geology
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental science
Spanish
Government
History
Human Resource Management
Information Systems
Law
Literature
Mathematics
Nursing
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Reading
Science
Social Science
Home
Homework Answers
Blog
Archive
Tags
Reviews
Contact
twitterfacebook
Copyright © 2021 SweetStudy.com