This is a continuation of the first and second assignments and uses your accumulated research. Imagine you are two different lobbyists, supporting two different sides of the policy issue you wrote about in the last paper.
Submit your revisions from the Week 3 assignment, Historical Perspective, and the Week 6 assignment, Analyzing Policy based on your professor’s feedback. You will be graded on your revisions. Then, write a paper in which you:
Write a one-page position in favor of the policy.
Write a one-page position against the policy.
Write a one-page response to the argument in favor of the policy.
Write a one-page response to the argument against the policy.
Use at least two of the following arguments from Chapter 10 in your paper: normative, positive, anecdote, and evidence arguments. Clearly label each to receive credit.
Include at least four peer-reviewed references (no more than five years old) from material outside the textbook. Note: Appropriate peer-reviewed references include scholarly articles and governmental websites. Wikipedia, other wikis, and any other websites ending in anything other than “.gov” do not qualify as peer-reviewed
1
The Evolution and Impact of the Affordable Care Act Across Presidential Administrations
Ashley White
Introduction to Public Policy Analysis
Due: 4/21/2024
Introduction
2
The Affordable Care Act (ACA), which President Obama passed, has opened a new
chapter and has improved health care policy in the United States. One objective of the ACA is to
provide more affordable and available opportunities. Nevertheless, it gained and lost support. It
will be all about revealing the longevity of the organization’s beginning, its limitations, and its
success. The ACA remains an impervious subject of the American healthcare reform debate.
Therefore, to understand the issue, it is necessary to appreciate the ACA’s evolution through
different administrations.
Historical Perspective
The United States healthcare system dealt with burgeoning expenditures associated with
a growing number of uninsured Americans before the ACA was passed. Confronted by the
implications, health care expenses running rampant, which could consume an unbearable portion
of the national budget, became clear. The financial crisis 2008 further exposed the risk faced by
millions of Americans who do not own employer-sponsored insurance, which might lead to
financial downfall due to medical care expenses (Glied et al., 2020). Before this time, the
Republicans controlled both the House and the Senate, and the president could not push for
reforms and pass them.
The ACA was signed into law on 23 March 2010 despite the uphill battle and intense
arguments. It vowed to re-engineer the contours of the American healthcare system by requiring
insurance coverage, expanding Medicaid, and setting up health insurance exchanges. A
pronounced ideological split, manifested this era for some of the proponents saw the ACA as a
long-awaited step towards universal health care, and on the other hand, opponents of the act
criticized it as a government interposition (López-Santana & Rocco, 2021). Undoubtedly, the
3
ACA brought a huge leap for the government regarding health coverage as it aimed to step above
the system errors that had been in the system for ages.
Social, Economic, and Political Environments
The ACA operations occurred due to a difficult background of multi-threaded social,
economic, and political processes. As a social aspect of ACA, we are looking to tackle the
statistics that sort out the haves and have-nots with healthcare access while highlighting the
marginalized groups. It brought about a substantial surge in beneficiaries beyond millions who
became insured. But it also faced the wine of blame for not deterred the soaring premium and
other costs, which added a burden for many Americans.
The ACA had different economic impacts, which are discussed below. It was intended to
limit health care costs but showed success only in mixed percentages. Although it has frustrated
spending growth, some high-profile people typically criticize the matter, as it is costly for
businesses and individuals. Advocates suggested that extended-term savings and the general
necessity to provide health care for all are the keys to the discussion.
The ACA became a rallying banner for senators on both the right and left wings. It was a
lopsided vote, with not a single Republican who stood up in favor of it, symbolizing the
unbridgeable animosity of the polarization. With that, the policy swung into the sights of later
elections, where Republicans pledged to scrap and redo it. The incoming Trump administration
had several efforts geared towards deconstructing the ACA upon its inception, and one of these
successes came with the repeal of the individual mandate penalty that formed part of the 2017
tax reform.
4
ACA’s winding through these polarized spaces demonstrates the obstacles to passing a
deep reform in a country in a polarized state. The policy result can be demonstrated through this
vignette by showing the interrelation between the policy intentions and the actual consequences.
This finding emphasizes that continuous evaluation and adjustment will always be needed.
Policy Critique
The ACA went a long way but did not turn the discussion or solve the problem
completely. Advocates praised ACA as an effective and beneficial set of changes, including
diminishing the number of uninsured citizens and introducing essential health benefits. The
policy has led to a new horizon, considering the affordability of preventive services and
enrollment of those with pre-existing conditions.
The act inevitably raised controversy. The problem of the individual mandate, which
required all individuals to have health insurance and resulted in a penalty otherwise, was rather
an issue. The critics submitted that the requirement threatened personal liberties and, in reality,
imposed monetary problems on those who could afford insurance, even after the subsidies (Soni
et al., 2020). Furthermore, ACA does not completely resolve the issues of high health care costs,
which resulted in higher premiums and deductibles and, hence, continued to create tight spaces
for many American households.
The implications of political opposition and legal disputes further led to the policy
uncertainty and destabilization of the insurance markets, which were meant to be efficient. For
example, the decision to repeal the individual mandate under the Trump presidency might result
in higher premiums and a higher uninsured rate.
5
Looking back, the ACA was a major reform in the field of health care, but at the same
time, it clearly showed how policy itself could be complicated when in a political landscape
fraught with divisions. Its legacy stands for the unrelentingly ongoing dispute over the role of the
government in health care and the most successful way of providing universal coverage and cost
control.
Conclusion
The turbulent ride of the ACA through successive Administrations reflects the intricacies
of healthcare reform in the U.S. On the upside, it opened the way for about 30 million Americans
to access health insurance and brought important new protections. On the downside, it was not
without conflicts and shortcomings. Meanwhile, the ongoing debate gives evidence of the
challenging process of finding a good and genuine balance between healthcare access and
people’s freedom. The ACA’s legacy, bearing both successes and controversies, stipulates the
issues left out to be figured out in the American healthcare policy narrative.
6
Sources
Glied, S. A., Collins, S. R., & Lin, S. (2020). Did The ACA Lower Americans Financial
Barriers To Health Care? Health Affairs, 39(3), 379386.
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01448
López-Santana, M., & Rocco, P. (2021). Fiscal Federalism and Economic Crises in the United
States: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic and Great Recession. Publius: The
Journal of Federalism, 51(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjab015
Soni, A., Wherry, L. R., & Simon, K. I. (2020). How Have ACA Insurance Expansions Affected
Health Outcomes? Findings From The Literature. Health Affairs, 39(3), 371378.
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01436
1
Public Policy Analysis
Ashley White
Introduction to Public Policy Analysis
Due: 4/21/2024
2
Public Policy Analysis
Summary of the Affordable Care Act (ACA)
The ACA, which is also referred to as Obamacare, is an acronym for President Barack
Obama. It was signed into law on 23rd March 2010 and is one of the major reforms enacted
within the American healthcare system. Based on its objectives, the ACA policy tends to
enhance the affordability and accessibility of health insurance coverage. As a result, it is very
significant as it decreases the number of uninsured Americans and the healthcare costs. As stated
by various scholars like López-Santana, & Rocco (2021), the implementation of this policy was
sequenced by the backdrop of escalating healthcare costs, an increasing number of underinsured/
uninsured Americans, and the aftermath of the 2008 economic recession that revealed the
financial circumstances of those not covered under employer-based plans.
Thus, the ACA sought to address these issues by incorporating several provisions. These
included extending Medicaid to provide health insurance for more low-income earners, creating
health insurance markets to aid the purchase of insurance, requiring individuals to have insurance
to increase the pool of people at risk for paying premiums and banning insurance companies
from refusing to sell policies based on medical histories. These measures also addressed
inequality and sustainability within the healthcare system.
Nevertheless, the ACA has received significant political hostility and legal challenges,
especially the individual mandate, which requires all individuals to have health insurance or be
penalized (Van Houtven et al., 2020). This provision was heavily contested and deemed an
impingement on personal liberties. Nevertheless, some achievements have also been registered,
including declining uninsured and providing essential health benefits.
3
Recommendations to enhance the ACA include rising subsidies to render insurance
cheaper, additional enlargement of Medicaid, and tackling the exorbifold premiums and
deductibles that plague several Americans (Campbell & Shore-Sheppard, 2020). Even though
there are those who disagree with the ACA, it is an essential part of healthcare policy in the US
and a reflection of the ongoing battle for healthcare for all Americans.
Stakeholders Involved with the ACA
Official Stakeholders
1. Federal Government
o
Congress: Accountable for pushing through the ACA and any other eventual
revisions or abolitions.
o
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) implements the ACA
through Medicaid expansion and exchange for health insurance (López-Santana &
Rocco, 2021).
2. State Governments: Administer the state-based health insurance exchanges and expand
Medicaid coverage.
Unofficial Stakeholders
1. Healthcare Providers
o
Hospitals: Impacted by changes in reimbursement rates and rise in indemnity
enrollees.
o
Physicians: These are affected by new regulation-patient insurance coverage
changes.
4
2. Insurance Companies: As required by new regulations, coverage of pre-existing
conditions and minimum essential benefits must be maintained (Campbell & ShoreSheppard, 2020).
3. Employers: Especially the huge employers obligated to offer their employees health
insurance or pay penalties.
4. Patients and Consumers: Immediately impacted by access, affordability, and healthcare
coverage.
5. Interest Groups and Advocacy Organizations
o
American Medical Association (AMA): This professional association for
physicians and medical students seeks to shape health care policy.
o
America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP): Reflects the health insurance
industry and advocacy regarding matters affecting insurers.
o
AARP: Healthcare policy includes groups advocating for issues affecting older
Americans (López-Santana & Rocco, 2021).
o
National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB): Includes members from
small businesses who are usually vocal about their negative experiences with the
ACA employer requirements (Manski, 2019).
Role and Function of Stakeholders
Federal Government
Congress: Crafts healthcare bill and sees it passed through the debates and drafts. It
organizes hearings and funds and monitors the law’s implementation (Manski, 2019).
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS): creates rules, operates programs,
and enforces affirmations to ACA.
5
State Governments
Encourage their states to expand Medicaid and create insurance exchanges suited to their
population. They also effectively check state regulations concerning insurance (Manski,
2019).
Healthcare Providers
Hospitals and Physicians: Embrace change: Offer medical services to patients, handle
new reimbursement models, and prepare for new healthcare regulations.
Insurance Companies
Create health insurance plans that comply with the ACA, such as providing essential
health benefits and including pre-existing conditions.
Employers
Provide health insurance options to the employees as required by the ACA. Alternatively,
choose to pay penalties. They must assess ACA provisions, including the employer
mandate and reporting rules (Van Houtven et al., 2020).
Patients or Consumers
Obtain health insurance via exchanges, access subsidies, and Medicaid expansion, and
see shifts in coverage and healthcare expenses.
Interest Groups and Advocacy Organizations
American Medical Association (AMA): Powers health care policy in terms of lobbying,
public relations, and for or against specific legislation for physicians and patients (LópezSantana & Rocco, 2021).
America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP): Protects the interests of health insurers by
lobbying for regulations and policies that benefit their products.
6
AARP: Supporters of government healthcare policies favorable to the older population,
like a defense of Medicare and coverage for all.
National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB): Promotes the interests of small
businesses; it often acts as a lobby against regulations seen as undesirable.
Political Influence of Key Stakeholders
American Medical Association (AMA)
Motives: The AMA aims to promote physicians’ interests and ensure the delivery of high-quality
medical care. It supports diverse policies that facilitate patients’ access to healthcare services,
physician compensation rates, and the general effectiveness of the healthcare system.
Conflicts: The AMA has, at times, opposed policymakers based on the extent of reimbursement
for physicians and policies that may affect both the independence and economics of the
physician (Van Houtven et al., 2020). It has also witnessed internal struggles because of the
members’ differences in thinking on healthcare reform.
Interrelationships: AMA partners with other medical specialty societies and health advocacy
organizations to influence legislation regarding the healthcare system. These efforts include
lobbying, public campaigns, and expert evidence and opinion.
Impacts on the ACA: The AMA played a critical role in the ACA’s enactment because the
organization helped legitimize the reforms among healthcare practitioners (Soni et al., 2020).
However, it has also pushed or campaigned for significant modifications with the intention of
addressing various or common concerns raised by physicians, like reducing administrative
burdens and improving reimbursement rates.
7
America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP)
Motives: AHIP plays a significant role as it tends to or seeks to represent the interests of the
health insurance industry. That is, it advocates for policies that enhance the industry’s
profitability and sustainability. It aims to lobby for changes in insurance availability, cost, and
competition rules.
Conflicts: AHIP has been at loggerheads with consumer groups and policymakers on several
occasions over issues such as rating up, essential coverage, and market rules (López-Santana &
Rocco, 2021). It has also received criticism for promoting the commercial interests of the
industries to neglect the patients’ needs.
Interrelationships: AHIP focuses on engaging with insurance firms, healthcare service
providers, and policymakers to ensure that the desired healthcare policy is implemented. It
practices heavy lobbying, public relations, and coalition building.
Impacts on the ACA: AHIP also significantly influenced the ACA’s implementation and the
final form of the legislation regarding insurance exchanges and market regulations (Soni et al.,
2020). Though it championed some of the aspects of the ACA that increased coverage, it denied
other coverage that was viewed as too limiting or expensive to the insurers. AHIP has continued
to influence further regulation adjustments and the policy issues that need to be covered in future
policy discussions concerning the industry.
Conclusion
The ACA’s history across various presidential administrations demonstrates how politics
and healthcare intertwine. Even though the ACA has dramatically improved insurance coverage
and added meaningful insurance consultations at the same time, there have been serious issues
and criticisms against the ACA. The fact that so many stakeholders are drawn to the problem
8
with different agendas and leverage shows the changing landscape of interest in healthcare
policy. It is crucial to understand these stakeholders’ roles and their related political power to
appreciate the ACA’s development and the current discussion about the destiny of American
healthcare.
9
References
Campbell, A. L., & Shore-Sheppard, L. (2020). The social, political, and economic effects of the
Affordable Care Act: introduction to the issue. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation
Journal of the Social Sciences, 6(2), 1-40.
López-Santana, M., & Rocco, P. (2021). Fiscal Federalism and Economic Crises in the United
States: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic and Great Recession. Publius: The
Journal of Federalism, 51(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjab015
Manski, C. F. (2019). Communicating uncertainty in policy analysis. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, 116(16), 7634-7641.
Soni, A., Wherry, L. R., & Simon, K. I. (2020). How Have ACA Insurance Expansions Affected
Health Outcomes? Findings From The Literature. Health Affairs, 39(3), 371378.
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01436
Van Houtven, C. H., McGarry, B. E., Jutkowitz, E., & Grabowski, D. C. (2020). Association of
Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act with use of
long-term care. JAMA network open, 3(10), e2018728-e2018728.
